Compare · Qualisend vs Bouncer
Qualisend vs Bouncer.
Both verify email addresses down to a real SMTP conversation. Bouncer fits EU teams that value the same data-residency posture and want a polished, focused verifier. Qualisend fits teams comparing EU options that want deeper per-address detail, a developer-first API and a lower entry price. Everything below is sourced and dated — where we haven't verified a Bouncer capability, we say so instead of guessing.
Choose Qualisend if
You want the same EU posture with deeper per-address evidence (MX, provider, SMTP reason), a developer-first API, and a lower entry price at $6 per 1,000.
Choose Bouncer if
You want a polished, EU-hosted verifier with deep catch-all detection and a toxicity score, and its pricing and feature set already fit your workflow.
Side by side
Eight criteria buyers actually decide on — not every feature either product has. Bouncer facts come from their public pricing and docs, captured 2026-07; recheck before relying on them.
| Criterion | Qualisend | Bouncer |
|---|---|---|
| Entry price | $6 / 1,000 pay-as-you-go, no minimum plan | $8 / 1,000 (~$0.008 per address)source: usebouncer.com/pricing · 2026-07 |
| Free tier | 100 credits, never expire | 100 free creditssource: pricing page · 2026-07 |
| Catch-all handling | Reported as catch-all, with the SMTP evidence shown — never rounded up to "valid" | Deep catch-all detectionsource: API docs · 2026-07 |
| Per-address evidence | MX record, inferred provider, SMTP reason code on every result | 0–100 score plus a 0–5 toxicity scoresource: API docs · 2026-07 |
| Bulk cleaning | CSV or paste up to 1M addresses, live progress, duplicates charged once | Bulk upload and cleansource: product pages · 2026-07 |
| Developer API | REST, scoped keys, per-key rate limits | REST APIsource: API docs · 2026-07 |
| Adjacent tools | None — verification only, by design | Verification-focused (deliverability kit add-on)source: product pages · 2026-07 |
| EU data processing | All processing on EU infrastructure (Ireland) | EU-hosted, GDPRsource: docs · 2026-07 |
Pricing at real volumes
One example bracket each. Both providers get cheaper at volume — the difference is at the entry point and in the subscription model.
Qualisend
$6
per 1,000 verifications, pay-as-you-go
- Credits never expire
- Pro subscription: any volume 1k–1M at 20% below pay-as-you-go
- Duplicates in a list charged once
Bouncer
$8
per 1,000 (~$0.008 each) · captured 2026-07
- 100 free credits
- Volume discounts at higher brackets
- EU-hosted, GDPR-first
The real difference: what a verdict means
Feature tables hide the philosophical gap. These two are why teams switch to us.
We don't round catch-all up
When a domain accepts every address, no vendor can truly confirm the mailbox — so we say exactly that, show the probe evidence, and let you decide your risk tolerance. Verdicts that quietly upgrade "unverifiable" to "valid" look better in a demo and cost you bounces in production.
Every result shows its work
Each address carries its MX record, inferred provider, and the raw SMTP reason. When a result surprises you, you can see why instead of trusting a black box — which also means you can defend the clean to a client or a deliverability auditor.
Common questions
Other comparisons
Run the same list through both.
100 free credits, no card. Verify a sample in Qualisend, compare the verdicts and the evidence against what Bouncer told you, and keep whichever you trust more.